[MARMAM] new publication on pile-driving and porpoises

Dähne Michael Michael.Daehne at tiho-hannover.de
Wed Apr 10 06:44:08 PDT 2013


Dear colleagues,

I am pleased to announce the publication of the following paper in Environmental Research Letters In the focus issue on the Environmental Impact of Wind Energy<http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/focus/Environmental%20impact%20of%20wind%20energy>:

Effects of pile-driving on harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) at the first offshore wind farm in Germany Michael Dähne, Anita Gilles, Klaus Lucke, Verena Peschko, Sven Adler, Kathrin Krügel, Janne Sundermeyer and Ursula Siebert, Environ. Res. Lett. 8 025002 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/025002<http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/025002>

The article is downloadable free of charge (open access) under
http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/025002
Abstract:
The first offshore wind farm 'alpha ventus' in the German North Sea was constructed north east of Borkum Reef Ground approximately 45 km north off the German coast in 2008 and 2009 using percussive piling for the foundations of 12 wind turbines. Visual monitoring of harbour porpoises was conducted prior to as well as during construction and operation by means of 15 aerial line transect distance sampling surveys, from 2008 to 2010. Static acoustic monitoring (SAM) with echolocation click loggers at 12 positions was performed additionally from 2008 to 2011. SAM devices were deployed between 1 and 50 km from the centre of the wind farm. During aerial surveys, 18 600 km of transect lines were covered in two survey areas (10 934 and 11 824 km2) and 1392 harbour porpoise sightings were recorded. Lowest densities were documented during the construction period in 2009. The spatial distribution pattern recorded on two aerial surveys three weeks before and exactly during pile-driving points towards a strong avoidance response within 20 km distance of the noise source. Generalized additive modelling of SAM data showed a negative impact of pile-driving on relative porpoise detection rates at eight positions at distances less than 10.8 km. Increased detection rates were found at two positions at 25 and 50 km distance suggesting that porpoises were displaced towards these positions. A pile-driving related behavioural reaction could thus be detected using SAM at a much larger distance than a pure avoidance radius would suggest. The first waiting time (interval between porpoise detections of at least 10 min), after piling started, increased with longer piling durations. A gradient in avoidance, a gradual fading of the avoidance reaction with increasing distance from the piling site, is hence most probably a product of an incomplete displacement during shorter piling events.
I hope you find the article interesting.

Best regards,

Michael Dähne and Co-Authors




---
Michael Dähne
Institute for Terrestrial and Aquatic Wildlife Research (ITAW)
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation
Werftstraße 6
25761 Büsum
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.uvic.ca/pipermail/marmam/attachments/20130410/42fb5d27/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the MARMAM mailing list