[MARMAM] New(ish) publication

Simon Allen S.Allen at murdoch.edu.au
Wed May 7 21:14:24 PDT 2008

G'day folks,
The following paper on compliance to a voluntary code of conduct for dolphin watching was published in the most recent issue of The Journal of Cetacean Research and Management: 
Allen, S., Smith, H., Waples, K. and Harcourt, R. 2007. The voluntary code of conduct for dolphin watching in Port Stephens, Australia: is self-regulation an effective management tool? Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 9(2): 159-166.
ABSTRACT: In the absence of guidelines or government regulation for a rapidly expanding industry, dolphin watching operators in Port Stephens, New SouthWales, Australia, formulated and adopted a voluntary code of conduct in 1996. This code was designed to reduce perceived pressures on dolphins and was updated to conform to the Australian National Guidelines for Cetacean Observation when they were released in 2000. Compliance to this code of conduct was assessed in a shore-based survey over the austral summer of 2002/03. Operator compliance was generally high for: number of dolphin watching boats per dolphin school; time spent by individual operators with dolphins; method of approach to dolphins; and frequency of cruises conducted per day. However, operators did not discriminate between dolphin schools containing calves and those that did not (equating to a breach of the national guidelines) and three of nine regular operators committed most breaches of the code, particularly with regard to boat-handling around dolphins and frequency of cruises conducted per day. The code's aim in reducing exposure of dolphins to boats was not achieved as dolphin schools were subject to consecutive approaches by numerous boats and interactions also involved boats to which the code did not apply. This voluntary code is thus of limited value without revision, education and enforcement. The inability of a voluntary code to manage the number of operators and other watercraft highlights the need for management alternatives that will increase compliance by all users of the waterways. Furthermore, widespread assessments of compliance are necessary, particularly where assessments of the effects of cetacean-based tourism are being conducted. To determine whether identified impacts are a result of inappropriate management strategies, or non-compliance with suitable management, requires that management strategies are tested while simultaneously testing or ensuring compliance.
Essentially we show that individual operator compliance was quite high when compared with that in some other parts of Australia and the world, but that this unfortunately does not necessarily translate into reduced exposure of resident dolphins to boating activity in a multi-vessel, intensive industry such as that in Port Stephens. The fact that Port Stephens is now a Marine Protected Area should see some overdue improvements in management of commercial and recreational vessel traffic around dolphins by the end of the year.
Anyone interested in receiving the PDF of the article can drop me an email or, alternatively, it will appear on the MUCRU website within a few weeks.
Best wishes, Simon 
Simon Allen
Research Associate, Murdoch University Cetacean Research Unit
Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research
Murdoch University
South St., Murdoch
Western Australia 6150
s.allen at murdoch.edu.au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.uvic.ca/pipermail/marmam/attachments/20080508/a32211a6/attachment.html>

More information about the MARMAM mailing list