[ilds] OER

Denise Tart & David Green dtart at bigpond.net.au
Tue May 17 13:02:01 PDT 2016


Ah yes, the free market, free to those that can afford it, expensive for those that can't.
Charlock must have views on this?

David

Sent from my iPad

> On 17 May 2016, at 12:55 AM, Bruce Redwine <bredwine1968 at earthlink.net> wrote:
> 
> Yes.  Another point about the “paywall.”  I understand that publishers have to make money to stay publishing, but I don’t understand their greed to gouge the public.  Many a time I’ve found an article I’d like to buy—but not if the publisher is charging $25+ to download.  I’ve worked in a publishing house and know how some editors think—charge whatever the market will bear, and if that’s 10x the value of the product, then so be it.  I’ll really against this “free-market” mentality.
> 
> Bruce
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On May 15, 2016, at 1:11 PM, Ric Wilson <Ric.Wilson at msn.com> wrote:
>> 
>> This may be as good as it gets said Mr. Nicholson once ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Nicholson ). The paywall has a long and elaborate history, a double-edged sword, ad infinitem. On one hand, there are those who'd look toward learning as an unlimited resource yielding ROI that clearly outweighs a phenomenon like "regulated capture." But this favors the precariat learner, an intoxicatingly seductive slant once upon a time. Darley's fiction was deemed genuine somewhere in that meandering track going backwards, so his point of view was immediately adopted. Snap.
>> 
>> On the other hand, estates are formed and designed through the fictions society creates for securing an elite "controlling" class of producers--writers included. It may not be appropriate to re-read one's AQ if in fact in the secrecy of his panic chamber he's supplementing his viewing of an appropriately acquired hard-copy with an unrestricted digitally thieved one--an unauthorized version on his 24+" from .ru--tapping into an uncontrolled server to assist waning eyesight. And hey, friends, there's undeniable residual angst at LD for leading me on through what, upon careful review in this community's chatter, may have been a cop-out's story. Am I the junky, then? Mutinously, one may insist privately that deconstructing LD's text(s)--googling out its fabric upon a virtual loom without the benefit of rulers, deciphering every single deliberately placed loose end (foreign phrases, place references, uncanny or unheard of schools of thought)--may reverse a precariate's cravings (!
>> see also http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-04-20/a-controversial-response-to-heroin-epidemic-supervised



More information about the ILDS mailing list