From pieterwiest at att.net Fri Nov 11 22:50:05 2011 From: pieterwiest at att.net (PIETER WIEST) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:50:05 -0800 (PST) Subject: [ilds] Recollected passage; Durrell? Message-ID: <1321080605.65395.YahooMailClassic@web180002.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Hello: Many years ago I was struck by the writer's good sense in that his handling of a scene involving two lovers, I believe on an island, was so unique, yet stamped with such seeming authenticity.? These lovers knew their time together was to be brief as the husband of one was known to be approaching the island by motorboat.? In their final moments together, they faced each other on opposing chairs or divans, and each masturbated.? This is my recollection, anyway. I thought it must have been Durrell, in the Quartet, but on rereading the books, lo, the scene was not there. Am I wrong about what I had read as a young man, or is it a matter, perhaps, of expurgation? Pieter Wiest -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From james.d.gifford at gmail.com Sat Nov 12 11:28:01 2011 From: james.d.gifford at gmail.com (James Gifford) Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:28:01 -0800 Subject: [ilds] Recollected passage; Durrell? In-Reply-To: <1321080605.65395.YahooMailClassic@web180002.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <1321080605.65395.YahooMailClassic@web180002.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <4EBEC8C1.3080300@gmail.com> Hi all, Just a quick note that Pieter Wiest isn't subscribed to the listserv, so please reply to him directly or Cc his email address in any responses: Cheers, James On 11/11/11 10:50 PM, PIETER WIEST wrote: > Hello: > > Many years ago I was struck by the writer's good sense in that his > handling of a scene involving two lovers, I believe on an island, was so > unique, yet stamped with such seeming authenticity. These lovers knew > their time together was to be brief as the husband of one was known to > be approaching the island by motorboat. In their final moments together, > they faced each other on opposing chairs or divans, and each > masturbated. This is my recollection, anyway. > > I thought it must have been Durrell, in the Quartet, but on rereading > the books, lo, the scene was not there. > > Am I wrong about what I had read as a young man, or is it a matter, > perhaps, of expurgation? > > Pieter Wiest > > > > _______________________________________________ > ILDS mailing list > ILDS at lists.uvic.ca > https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/ilds From james.d.gifford at gmail.com Sat Nov 12 12:07:48 2011 From: james.d.gifford at gmail.com (James Gifford) Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 12:07:48 -0800 Subject: [ilds] Recollected passage; Durrell? In-Reply-To: <1321080605.65395.YahooMailClassic@web180002.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <1321080605.65395.YahooMailClassic@web180002.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <4EBED214.1090608@gmail.com> Hi Pieter, I think this must be drawn in from another text. Sometimes I find different works blurring together, like one phrase from a song turning into another... I can't think of any motorboats in the Quartet, though the various pieces are there: a boat, and island, couples with spouses, peculiar facing scenes. Pitch in a mirror or harpoon, and the effect would be complete! Best, James On 11/11/11 10:50 PM, PIETER WIEST wrote: > Hello: > > Many years ago I was struck by the writer's good sense in that his > handling of a scene involving two lovers, I believe on an island, was so > unique, yet stamped with such seeming authenticity. These lovers knew > their time together was to be brief as the husband of one was known to > be approaching the island by motorboat. In their final moments together, > they faced each other on opposing chairs or divans, and each > masturbated. This is my recollection, anyway. > > I thought it must have been Durrell, in the Quartet, but on rereading > the books, lo, the scene was not there. > > Am I wrong about what I had read as a young man, or is it a matter, > perhaps, of expurgation? > > Pieter Wiest > > > > _______________________________________________ > ILDS mailing list > ILDS at lists.uvic.ca > https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/ilds From godshawl at ucmail.uc.edu Sun Nov 13 14:21:03 2011 From: godshawl at ucmail.uc.edu (Godshalk, William (godshawl)) Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:21:03 -0500 Subject: [ilds] Recollected passage; Durrell? In-Reply-To: <4EBED214.1090608@gmail.com> References: <1321080605.65395.YahooMailClassic@web180002.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>, <4EBED214.1090608@gmail.com> Message-ID: <94B18F18BF859846A11A82A6166B6C420209053E92F3@UCMAILBE2.ad.uc.edu> There's a hydroplane in the AQ -- which may or may not be a boat. Gatsby says he has one, and asks Nick to go out with him. Bill W. L. Godshalk * Department of English * * University of Cincinnati* * Stellar Disorder * OH 45221-0069 * * ________________________________________ From: ilds-bounces at lists.uvic.ca [ilds-bounces at lists.uvic.ca] On Behalf Of James Gifford [james.d.gifford at gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:07 PM To: ilds at lists.uvic.ca; pieterwiest at att.net Subject: Re: [ilds] Recollected passage; Durrell? Hi Pieter, I think this must be drawn in from another text. Sometimes I find different works blurring together, like one phrase from a song turning into another... I can't think of any motorboats in the Quartet, though the various pieces are there: a boat, and island, couples with spouses, peculiar facing scenes. Pitch in a mirror or harpoon, and the effect would be complete! Best, James On 11/11/11 10:50 PM, PIETER WIEST wrote: > Hello: > > Many years ago I was struck by the writer's good sense in that his > handling of a scene involving two lovers, I believe on an island, was so > unique, yet stamped with such seeming authenticity. These lovers knew > their time together was to be brief as the husband of one was known to > be approaching the island by motorboat. In their final moments together, > they faced each other on opposing chairs or divans, and each > masturbated. This is my recollection, anyway. > > I thought it must have been Durrell, in the Quartet, but on rereading > the books, lo, the scene was not there. > > Am I wrong about what I had read as a young man, or is it a matter, > perhaps, of expurgation? > > Pieter Wiest > > > > _______________________________________________ > ILDS mailing list > ILDS at lists.uvic.ca > https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/ilds _______________________________________________ ILDS mailing list ILDS at lists.uvic.ca https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/ilds From ttipas at runbox.no Sun Nov 13 23:01:51 2011 From: ttipas at runbox.no (tib pas) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:01:51 +0100 (CET) Subject: [ilds] palimpsest Message-ID: Good morning, the good news, at least as far as i'm concerned, is that i am about to embark on what i hope will be a meaningful discussion of the palimpsest in the AQ. the bad news is that most of my scholarly books and notes have been left behind in the States and that at this point my home port is in the middle of nowhere, specifically a gothic noplaceville in spooky Transylvania, where vampires are in need of dental work, not to mention scholarly material for LD-related work. The libraries in the capital are not any more bounteous in this respect either. So my question to the LD community is: would you be aware of significant scholarly work on the palimpsest in Durrell? Articles in journals? Goes w/o saying i've been through the ILDS online bibliography but with hardly any luck. i will appreciate any suggestion. thank you. tiberio z. paskuy ======================================== THE BIG PRINT: For practical purposes keep in mind that email is NOT confidential. The fine print: This message and any files transmitted with it ARE CONFIDENTIAL to the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. You should notify the sender immediately and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. THIRD-PARTY use or diffusion of this message and/or its attachments is unlawful without the sender's written permission. The sender cannot be held responsible for any modification of his message resulting from electronic transmission. Ce message ?lectronique et chacune de ses annexes sont ?tablis ? l'attention exclusive du destinataire et peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, veuillez le d?truire et avertir son exp?diteur. Toute publication, reproduction, copie, distribution ou autre diffusion ou utilisation par des tiers est interdite sans autorisation expresse. L'exp?diteur ne peut ?tre tenu responsable d'une modification de son message qui r?sulterait de la transmission par voie ?lectronique. >================================= From ttipas at runbox.no Sun Nov 13 23:07:17 2011 From: ttipas at runbox.no (tib pas) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:07:17 +0100 (CET) Subject: [ilds] glitch Message-ID: please disregard the earlier of the two messages i just sent off ildswards. i accidentally hit the send key before i was done writing. all my apologies for the inconvenience. Please consider my second message if you think it worth considering. thank you tiberio =================================== THE BIG PRINT: For practical purposes keep in mind that email is NOT confidential. The fine print: This message and any files transmitted with it ARE CONFIDENTIAL to the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. You should notify the sender immediately and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. THIRD-PARTY use or diffusion of this message and/or its attachments is unlawful without the sender's written permission. The sender cannot be held responsible for any modification of his message resulting from electronic transmission. Ce message ?lectronique et chacune de ses annexes sont ?tablis ? l'attention exclusive du destinataire et peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, veuillez le d?truire et avertir son exp?diteur. Toute publication, reproduction, copie, distribution ou autre diffusion ou utilisation par des tiers est interdite sans autorisation expresse. L'exp?diteur ne peut ?tre tenu responsable d'une modification de son message qui r?sulterait de la transmission par voie ?lectronique. >================================= From ttipas at runbox.no Sun Nov 13 23:00:33 2011 From: ttipas at runbox.no (tib pas) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:00:33 +0100 (CET) Subject: [ilds] palimpsest Message-ID: Good morning, the good news, at least as far as i'm concerned, is that i am about to embark on what i hope will be a meaningful discussion of the palimpsest in the AQ. the bad news is that most of my scholarly books and notes have been left behind in the States and that at this point my home port is in the middle of nowhere, specifically a gothic noplaceville in spooky Transylvania, where vampires are in need of dental work, not to mention scholarly material for LD-related work. The libraries in the capital are not any more So my question to the LD community is: would you be aware of significant scholarly work on the palimpsest in Durrell? Articles in journals? Goes w/o saying i've been through the ILDS online bibliography but with hardly any luck. The fruits are ripe, dipped in fire, ... And there's a law, That things crawl off in the manner of snakes, Prophetically, dreaming on the hills of heaven. And there is much that needs to be retained, Like a load of wood on the shoulders. But the pathways are dangerous. The captured elements and ancient laws of earth Run astray like horses. There is a constant yearning For all that is unconfined. But much needs To be retained. And loyalty is required. H?lderlin, Mnemosyne======================================== THE BIG PRINT: For practical purposes keep in mind that email is NOT confidential. The fine print: This message and any files transmitted with it ARE CONFIDENTIAL to the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. You should notify the sender immediately and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. THIRD-PARTY use or diffusion of this message and/or its attachments is unlawful without the sender's written permission. The sender cannot be held responsible for any modification of his message resulting from electronic transmission. Ce message ?lectronique et chacune de ses annexes sont ?tablis ? l'attention exclusive du destinataire et peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, veuillez le d?truire et avertir son exp?diteur. Toute publication, reproduction, copie, distribution ou autre diffusion ou utilisation par des tiers est interdite sans autorisation expresse. L'exp?diteur ne peut ?tre tenu responsable d'une modification de son message qui r?sulterait de la transmission par voie ?lectronique. >================================= From james.d.gifford at gmail.com Sun Nov 13 23:53:07 2011 From: james.d.gifford at gmail.com (James Gifford) Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:53:07 -0800 Subject: [ilds] palimpsest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4EC0C8E3.7080304@gmail.com> Hello all, By way of suggestion, Mr. Paskuy is not subscribed to the ILDS listserv (at least not through the email address included), so can I request that responses be sent to him either directly or including him as Cc'd in the message -- he may not receive messages sent only to the list. Best, James On 13/11/11 11:01 PM, tib pas wrote: > Good morning, > the good news, at least as far as i'm concerned, is that i am about to embark on what i hope will be a meaningful discussion of the palimpsest in the AQ. the bad news is that most of my scholarly books and notes have been left behind in the States and that at this point my home port is in the middle of nowhere, specifically a gothic noplaceville in spooky Transylvania, where vampires are in need of dental work, not to mention scholarly material for LD-related work. The libraries in the capital are not any more bounteous in this respect either. So my question to the LD community is: would you be aware of significant scholarly work on the palimpsest in Durrell? Articles in journals? Goes w/o saying i've been through the ILDS online bibliography but with hardly any luck. > > i will appreciate any suggestion. > > > thank you. > > > tiberio z. paskuy > > > ======================================== > THE BIG PRINT: For practical purposes keep in mind that email is NOT confidential. > The fine print: This message and any files transmitted with it ARE CONFIDENTIAL to the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. You should notify the sender immediately and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. THIRD-PARTY use or diffusion of this message and/or its attachments is unlawful without the sender's written permission. The sender cannot be held responsible for any modification of his message resulting from electronic transmission. > > Ce message ?lectronique et chacune de ses annexes sont ?tablis ? l'attention exclusive du destinataire et peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, veuillez le d?truire et avertir son exp?diteur. Toute publication, reproduction, copie, distribution ou autre diffusion ou utilisation par des tiers est interdite sans autorisation expresse. L'exp?diteur ne peut ?tre tenu responsable d'une modification de son message qui r?sulterait de la transmission par voie ?lectronique. >> ================================= > > _______________________________________________ > ILDS mailing list > ILDS at lists.uvic.ca > https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/ilds