[ilds] Selected Fictions
Bruce Redwine
bredwine1968 at earthlink.net
Sat Oct 3 14:50:04 PDT 2009
Ilyas,
I agree. The selfs you list are developmental stages or social
constructs. We all have many "selfs" in this sense. But these are
not, I think, what Durrell and Lawrence and all the other theorizers
of the human personality mean by the "old stable ego." That "entity"
exists below appearances and social conventions. I also agree that
Cambridge would have been a good experience for LD. I can't see as
bad any institution that challenges you to think and to defend your
positions. By the way, I wish I had one of Durrell's paintings.
You're lucky.
Bruce
On Oct 3, 2009, at 2:04 PM, Ilyas wrote:
> Bruce, a number of thoughts occur to me on the back of your comments
> below.
>
> Durrell had many selfs – even outside his writing. He was,
> initially, a poet. His early work, including the precocious ballade
> of slow decay written I think in the early 1930’s, is a fine example
> of some signs of that “negative capability”. But durrell was a good
> poet who showed promise, rather than a great poet. Who now remembers
> his poetry as being the equal or even similar to Eliot, auden and
> spender ? And then he was a painter, in fact I possess a couple of
> his works. An interesting painter, but hardly notable, and one who
> would not be collected (however lethargically) were it not for his
> writing. And then he was a journalist, and a civil servant, and a
> lover. Even a magazine editor. He was all these things, and these
> personalities litter his later writings.
>
> I don’t mean, here, to suggest that he was good at many things, but
> brilliant or exceptional at none (since I consider him a hugely
> under-rated writer, and AQ as a truly great work), and therefore
> somehow an apologist, through his fictive creations, for his
> failings. But I do know that Oxbridge would have been the norm for
> LD and many of his friends and colleagues, and I feel that he
> carried the burden of failure more than he rejoiced at the freedom
> thus gained by not spending time amongst those glittering spires.
>
>
> On 03/10/2009 20:44, "Bruce Redwine" <bredwine1968 at earthlink.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Marc,
>>
>> Dunno what's an "Enneargram." But I see your main point about
>> roles and the way we play them. What you say is undoubtedly true.
>> We all have various social roles: in my case, son, husband,
>> father, friend, former soldier, perennial student, etc. That's a
>> little like Justine in the dressmaker's shop admiring herself in
>> different mirrors and seeing different views of the same person.
>> However, when Durrell starts talking about the self and its "many
>> negatives" or when Pursewarden makes pronouncements about lives and
>> "selected fictions," then I think they're referring to something
>> far more basic. Durrell is talking about one's core identity, the
>> "old stable ego," what you call the "true self" -- all that having
>> no real or true identity. Hence, the stress on "fiction." Being a
>> father or a husband is no fiction, those are social facts, but
>> calling the "I" or the "self" a fiction is something else again,
>> something radically different. All this is not new, but a
>> restatement or development of ideas central to Buddhism or touched
>> upon by some of the English Romantics. Keats begins to explore
>> this idea when he talks about the "camelion poet" and "negative
>> capability," i.e., great artists being able to assume other
>> identities because they live in some state of suspended identity.
>> All admittedly not very clear, but that's part of the appeal of the
>> notion. So, when someone says his core self doesn't exist or is
>> just multiple fictions, if he says that and truly believes and
>> demonstrates it, then I think that he's either a Zen Buddhist who's
>> reached some level of enlightenment or that he's showing early
>> signs of schizophrenia.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Bruce
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.uvic.ca/pipermail/ilds/attachments/20091003/6b92ca43/attachment.html
More information about the ILDS
mailing list