[ilds] michael wood on durrell

Bruce Redwine bredwine1968 at earthlink.net
Sat Dec 20 12:54:16 PST 2008


I think Wood's intent is clear and justified.  Both Conrad and Durrell  
are repititious and guilty of overwriting.  Wood has his criteria, but  
I don't agree with them.


Bruce



Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 20, 2008, at 12:32 PM, Charles Sligh <Charles-Sligh at utc.edu>  
wrote:

> Bruce Redwine wrote:
>> Wood is right, but so what?
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>>
>>
>>
> I am afraid I cannot tell what Michael Wood is intent upon in such a  
> wee
> sample.  For example, why does he treat /Clea/ with particular  
> attention?
>
> I will not have access to a copy of the LRB until post-holidays.  Any
> reports from list members who have read the whole piece will be  
> welcomed!
>
> C&c.
>
> -- 
> ********************************************
> Charles L. Sligh
> Assistant Professor
> Department of English
> University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
> charles-sligh at utc.edu
> ********************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> ILDS mailing list
> ILDS at lists.uvic.ca
> https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/ilds


More information about the ILDS mailing list