[ilds] Digested Classics: Justine

James Gifford odos.fanourios at gmail.com
Sat Nov 29 12:32:32 PST 2008

Hi Charles,

I'd agree, though I did find this satire entertaining.  My real 'beef' 
with it, where I think if falls short, isn't its lack of a nuanced sense 
of the heteroglossia of the original text (I can live with that), but 
rather the fact that the satire of Darley's overwrought style actually 
creates a few stylistically lovely moments in the satire itself...  If 
yer gonna mock the style, the mockery had better not sing!

Still, I think it's a better attempt than Bradbury's of yesteryear, and 
it seems to be a good-natured spoof rather than nasty envy.


Charles Sligh wrote:
> James Gifford wrote:
>> Marc Piel wrote:
>>> Just in bad taste.... is that satire?
>> I think that's most satire! Yes!
> The satire falls short because it mistakes Darley's style for Durrell's style.  
> There are so many other facets and voices and writerly styles in the /Quartet/.  And a good number of those voices--Pursewarden's and Arnauti's especially--make it clear that /Justine/ and the /Quartet/ are already parodies, self-satirical in their ironies. 
> Thus the problem with taking any one statement from /Justine/ with high seriousness.  Take a line from that novel and set it up it as precept--well,  Brother Ass, you crawl backward more like Polonius every day. . . .
> Charles

More information about the ILDS mailing list