[ilds] reality not semantic

Richard Pine richardpin at eircom.net
Tue Oct 30 12:17:01 PDT 2007

This is boring.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: william godshalk 
  To: Bruce Redwine ; ilds at lists.uvic.ca 
  Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 6:36 PM
  Subject: [ilds] reality not semantic

  I do not think this is about semantics. This is about reality and obscuring reality by verbiage.

  Art does not create its own world. Even artists do not create their own worlds. But isn't it pretty to think that they do? 

  And this is about ideas. 

  Cynical Old William

  At 10:52 PM 10/29/2007, you wrote:

    Now we are getting pedantic.  First it's about grammar, now about semantics.  I thought the List was interested in discussing ideas.


    -----Original Message-----
    >From: william godshalk <godshawl at email.uc.edu>
    >Sent: Oct 29, 2007 6:51 PM
    >To: Bruce Redwine <bredwine1968 at earthlink.net>, ilds at lists.uvic.ca
    >Subject: Re: [ilds] Throwing Dust
    >Art creates its ownworld.
    >Well, really, art creates and does nothing. Next time you find art atwork, please let me know. People, of course, create things. Not art. Ithink we should resist reification.
    >W. L.Godshalk          *
    >Department ofEnglish         *
    >University ofCincinnati           Stellar disorder  *
    >Cincinnati OH 45221-0069      *

    ILDS mailing list
    ILDS at lists.uvic.ca

  W. L. Godshalk           *
  Department of English         *
  University of Cincinnati            Stellar disorder  *
  Cincinnati OH 45221-0069      *


  ILDS mailing list
  ILDS at lists.uvic.ca
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.uvic.ca/pipermail/ilds/attachments/20071030/5dac6d3c/attachment.html 

More information about the ILDS mailing list