[ilds] It is semantic

Bruce Redwine bredwine1968 at earthlink.net
Tue Oct 30 12:18:51 PDT 2007

No. You're quibbling about semantics and turning a discussion about critical ideas into a classroom exercise on minutia.   That is pedantic and obfuscatory.  The meaning of the statement "art creates its own world" is quite clear.  Everyday and poetic language often reifies ("All art constantly aspires towards the condition of music," says Pater, and we understand what he means, although "art" is not person and can't "aspire" to anything).  People do not speak in the symbolic code of logicians.  And to say "even artists do not create their own worlds" is really quite beyond me.  I think you must be joking.  Now, I'm sure of it.


-----Original Message-----
>From: william godshalk <godshawl at email.uc.edu>
>Sent: Oct 30, 2007 11:36 AM
>To: Bruce Redwine <bredwine1968 at earthlink.net>, ilds at lists.uvic.ca
>Subject: reality not semantic
>I do not think this is about semantics. This is about reality andobscuring reality by verbiage.
>Art does not create its own world. Even artists do not create their ownworlds. But isn't it pretty to think that they do? 
>And this is about ideas. 
>Cynical Old William
>At 10:52 PM 10/29/2007, you wrote:
>Now we are gettingpedantic.  First it's about grammar, now about semantics.  Ithought the List was interested in discussing ideas.

More information about the ILDS mailing list