[ilds] baboonism

Michael Haag michaelhaag at btinternet.com
Sat Jul 7 22:57:55 PDT 2007

Well, let's say (whatever the funny hats he may wear) that the man 
comes through.  But it is his doing, not my invention.


On Sunday, July 8, 2007, at 06:29  am, James Gifford wrote:

> I think we're getting closer to articulating what we both really mean
> here, so it's been a useful (pragmatism again...) exercise.
> You say Durrell changes but is still recongisable in his travel books 
> (I
> won't say "non-fiction").  That's probably more useful for both of us
> than "always the same man" or "self with a core identity."  I doubt I
> can access that unchanging man or core identity in myself, let along an
> author I only know through words in a fiction book.  I'm certainly not
> the same man I was when my first academic article was published
> (actually, it was the first paper I wrote after I finished my 
> undergrad,
> with all the flaws of such a thing going to press unedited...).  A
> changing yet recognisable cloud of potentially contradictory traits and
> affiliations (always plural too) would seem far closer to Durrell's 
> view
> as well.
> But, if we aren't to trust what he says in an interview, then why 
> should
> we trust what we read in his books?  I think your answer will be that
> you recognise that continuity, which I will certainly grant you and
> admit I do as well, but isn't that something that's 'reader imminent'
> rather than an authorial intention?
> I suppose I want to have my cake, on a plate, and eat it too -- I want
> the author, the text, and the reader.  I get cranky when one's missing,
> just like when my plate's empty or the cake is in my hands.  Worst of
> all is having the cake on a plate without me there...
> Best,
> James
> Michael Haag wrote:
>> I am certainly not saying that Durrell remains unchanged.  He does
>> change; he has experiences, he reflects on them, he saddens, he grows,
>> etc; but he is still recognisably Durrell.  And what Durrell may say
>> about human character in an interview (or in a book) does not alter
>> that continuity that we read in his work.
>> :Michael
> _______________________________________________
> ILDS mailing list
> ILDS at lists.uvic.ca
> https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/ilds

More information about the ILDS mailing list