[ilds] The real behind the fictional people and situations
Marc Piel
marcpiel at interdesign.fr
Wed Jun 13 11:03:46 PDT 2007
Very interesting. I like Gunter Grass very much
also; I have always felt that a writer must have
lived at least a part of what he wrote in order to
write well!
Marc Piel
Smithchamberlin at aol.com wrote:
> For those interested in such things I suggest a thorough reading of
> Guenter Grass's memoir "Beim Haeuten der Zwiebel" in which he notes
> dozens of examples of people and events he experienced that he used in
> his various fictions.
> Brewster
>
> In a message dated 5/20/2007 3:00:40 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> ilds-request at lists.uvic.ca writes:
>
> Message: 39
> Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 18:40:12 +0100
> From: Michael Haag <michaelhaag at btinternet.com>
> Subject: Re: [ilds] Arnauti as real
> To: Bruce Redwine <bredwine1968 at earthlink.net>, ilds at lists.uvic.ca
> Message-ID: <2918C3D7-06F9-11DC-9409-000393B1149C at btinternet.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> My answer is that when I first Durrell, which was in the form of The
> Alexandria Quartet, I felt that behind many of the characters there
> were real people. That was probably just the effect of Durrell writing
> in the first person. Nevertheless that sense stayed with me. In time
> I discovered that a great deal of Durrell's creations in the Quartet --
> characters, settings, events -- were based on or in some way owed their
> origin to real characters, settings and events. There is nothing
> surprising about this. Writers do it all the time. And of course what
> writers also do is base creations on themselves. I do have the feeling
> that Durrell is always writing about his world and himself, and that he
> is desperately trying to escape both. And failing.
>
> :Michael
>
>
>
> On Sunday, May 20, 2007, at 05:11 pm, Bruce Redwine wrote:
>
> > On 5/20/07, Charles Sligh asks,
> >>
> >> But I have a question for you, Sumantra: How did you first realize
> >> that
> >> Arnauti and Purswarden were not "real"? That question is
> serious, and
> >> the answer could get to the bottom of the "tricks" that Durrell
> is "up
> >> to" in his books.
> >
> > * * * * *
> >
> > My answer. At the time of my primal event with M. Durrell (not Dr.
> > Durrell), age sixteen of my youth, I never thought any "person"
> in his
> > book was real. They were all fictional characters. I naively
> assumed
> > then that fiction was by definition unreal. Now, of course, after
> > discussions on the List, I know that none of us is real.
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ILDS mailing list
> > ILDS at lists.uvic.ca
> > https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/ilds
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 40
> Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 11:15:20 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
> From: Bruce Redwine <bredwine1968 at earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: [ilds] Arnauti as real as Durrell
> To: Durrell list <ilds at lists.uvic.ca>
> Message-ID:
>
> <31228166.1179684920729.JavaMail.root at elwamui-royal.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On 5/20/07, William Godshalk writes:
> >
> >Only the City is real. But the distinction between a fictive
> >character and a dead person is interesting to consider over a glass
> >of choice wine. Neither is around to define himself or herself. The
> >fictive character exists on paper, and the dead person now only
> >exists on paper (give or take some ashes). Well, paper or some other
> >recording material. Their parts can however be acted by actors.
> >
> >So Durrell and Arnauti are equally nonexistent.
> >
> >Bill (lookin for a fight)
>
> * * * * *
>
> I'll just swing a couple of wild punches and jump out of the ring
> (today is afternoon High Tea with a bunch of lawyers, ugh). This
> talk about real and not real is very deep water, and we probably
> need Dr. Durrell to throw out a life preserver. The "many fictions
> of ourselves," or some such (Jamie can provide the proper quotation
> and citation to the poetry) -- that's my starting point. And since
> we're playing in Durrell's Universe, solipsistic or otherwise, we
> might as well play his game and live in the "kingdom of your
> imagination" (Clea, end of "novel"). It's utterly futile, in my
> opinion, to argue, with Scholastic seriousness, about what is real
> and not with respect to LD's fiction and his life. Even as a pimply
> sixteen year old I knew that Durrell's "Alexandria" only truly
> existed in his head. I willingly entered that world and welcomed
> the seduction. Moreover, through our discussions, we are adding to
> the Master's fictive world. He always knew that. This is not !
> to say that a biographer, like Michael Haag, can't do the great
> research involved, point out the many connections between fact and
> fiction, show all the ramifications and permutations thereof, and
> then provide an explanation for all those interconnections. Yes, he
> can. That's fascinating and enjoyable -- an art in itself, a genre
> unto itself. But it's always going to be some kind of fiction. M.
> Durrell will always remain elusive and keep some part of himself to
> himself. He will surely triumph in the end. End of story.
>
> Bruce
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> See what's free at AOL.com <http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000503>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ILDS mailing list
> ILDS at lists.uvic.ca
> https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/ilds
More information about the ILDS
mailing list