[ilds] RG Justine -- ambiguity and intention

Michael Haag michaelhaag at btinternet.com
Mon Apr 30 13:41:17 PDT 2007


Do you mean what you say?



On Monday, April 30, 2007, at 08:02  pm, william godshalk wrote:

>
> What I am not happy with is the imputation of ambiguity where there is
> none.
>
> Michael
>
> Okay, I'll give you lack of ambiguity where there is none, if you give 
> me the pervasive ambiguity of intention.
>
>
> See Wimsatt's The Verbal Icon for the "intentional fallacy."
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
>  
>  
>
> _______________________________________________
> ILDS mailing list
> ILDS at lists.uvic.ca
> https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/ilds
>
> _______________________________________________
> ILDS mailing list
> ILDS at lists.uvic.ca
> https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/ilds
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 750 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.uvic.ca/pipermail/ilds/attachments/20070430/372e68a5/attachment.bin 


More information about the ILDS mailing list